I5-2500k vs i7-2600k handbrake software

A bit easier to compare which one has more bang for bucks between i7 and i5. We will pair the 2600k processor with the intel desktop motherboard. The intel core i56600k is based on the new skylake 14nm manufacturing process. Amd fx 8150 is claimed to be genuinely benefiting from the fma4 instruction set that sandy bridge lacks, in the ocl performance mandelbrot test, the fx 8150. In this video we compare the intel i5 2500k and i7 2600k processors in several benchmarks. I currently own main sig rig with an intel i7 950 cpu. Benchmarks real world tests of core i7 2600k vs i5 2500k geekbench 3. It will be a faster but you probably wont notice much of a difference in video quality. Based on 226,061 user benchmarks for the intel core i5 2500k and the core i7 2600k, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,236 cpus.

Cpuboss is not aware of any important advantages of the core i5 2500k vs the core i7 2600k. Produktdaten intel core i72600k prozessor 3,4 ghz box 8. The numbers for singlethreaded performance, multithreaded performance and integrated graphics performance charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can see in the benchmarks tab. First, the 2500k is nonhyperthreaded i5 sandybridge proc while the 6700k is a hyperthreaded i7 skylake which offers avx2 and fma support vs sb.

As for the cpu, its a small step up in performance from sandy bridge, breathing some fresh air into the lga1155 platform. Based on 9,717 user benchmarks for the intel core i52500k and the core i72700k, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,236 cpus. Core i7 2600k vs i5 2500k vs phenom 955be expertester. Why is intel core i52500k better than intel core i72600k. The i7 2600k is about 28% more effficient performancewise than the i5 2500k, so that means a boost of almost 30% in performance. The phenom ii x6 1100t shows well, outmoding the core i7875k by one second for second place. The core i52400, i52500k, and i72600k are the top models in intels new. Here is a detailed performance comparison of the 2500k vs 4670k. Comparing the 6600k and 6700k shows that the 6700k has faster multi and single core performance.

Compare two products sidebyside or see a cascading list of product. Sporting 4 physical cores with baseturbo clocks of 3. No matter what intel enthusiasts say about the i7 2700k. The graphics are upped, of course, but the standard operations havent slowed down at all. Examples of such software with quick sync support during encoding. The intel xeon e31240 is the second step up in the sandy bridge xeon e3 series when looking at processors that include hyperthreading. My advise to you is keep your i5 2500k and wait as you are fast enough. For more information on the sandy bridge xeon e3 series and bromolow platform including c202, c204, and c206 chipsets see. Scheda tecnica del prodotto intel core i52500k processore. Benchmarks real world tests of core i7 2600 vs i5 2500k.

Also what clock speeds could one reasonably hope to achieve on each without altering the voltages. Unfortunately id say that the 2600k vs kaby lake comparisons arent blowouts, at least in most metrics. Handbrake also makes good use of parallelism, handing the core. This i5 has been the most stable purchase alongside the asrock motherboard. In handbrake, where the i73960x held the biggest performance lead, it destroyed the i72600k to the tune of 36%. The core i73770k was faster overall than the i72600k by about 9% our guess is 7% vs. But would a 2600k be better for something like vmware server xen over an 2500k because of. Its hot chip for the money right now for our older mbs. Uses directx software vertex shader to run wings of fury and trolls lair games, and. Handbrake also makes good use of parallelism, handing the core i72600k a massive win. For the purposes of virtulisation, how does the i5 2500k compare to the i7 2600k. The 2600k is lucky enough to have been run in some modern benchmarks. Second, benchmarks show x264 1080p encodes speed up to 82 fps for the 6700k from 49 fps the 2600k, so a 10 hour encode on a 2600k would take 6 hours on a 6700k. We compare them against other current intel offerings as well as.

Intels core i52500k is just one second behind, tying the pricier core i7950, which operates on eight threads concurrently, but runs at a slower clock rate. Benchmarks real world tests of core i7 2600k vs i5 2500k geekbench 3 multicore data courtesy primate labs. Intel core i5 2500k or i7 2600k sandy bridge for video. Lavalys everest 3dmark06 3dmark vantage 3dmark 11 handbrake medialink espresso cinebench 11. The core i7 2600k is 10% faster than the core i7 975, and the 2500k easily outpaces its lynnfield rivals.

Welcome to the geekbench processor benchmark chart. Im looking to save a little money on my new build but i do do alot of. At 200 frames per second quick sync is more than twice the speed of a standard core i52500k or even the phenom ii x6 1100t. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each processor, the chart only includes processors with at least five unique results in the geekbench browser. Intels core i7 2600k is the lone processor to complete our test in under a. Intel core i5 2500k or i7 2600k sandy bridge for video encoding purposes. Intel quick sync video is intels brand for its dedicated video encoding and decoding hardware core. Discussion in processors and motherboards intel started by infinity, jul 29. Conclusion i7 2600k definitely has significant performance advantage over i5 2500k as shown in graph 1.

Llc associates program, an affiliate advertising program designed. Intel core i72600k prozessor 3,4 ghz box 8 mb smart cache bx80623i72600k prozessoren core i72600k processor 8m cache, 3. Performance vs price i7 vs i5 only same as second graph but without phenom 955 be. But in the end i would try both and decide upon the games i play. Below is a partial set of intel core i52500k and i73770 benchmarks from our cpu benchmark database. Im planning on building a second gaming rig for the kids. The charts below demonstrate relative performance of core i52500k and core i72600k processors in a few different types of programs. It is performing on par with the core i72600k in several popular cpu benchmarks such as winrar 4, x. Amd fx 8150 looks core i7980x and core i7 2600k in the. Discussion the i5 2500k and i7 2600k are still excellent.

For the below tests the bluray quality to iphone 4 handbrake presets were done on handbrake 0. A look at the intels core i52500k which is perhaps sandy bridges. The i73960x follows in the tradition of flagship intel chips, delivering top. We use the handbrake software suite which is multicore aware. This is a favorite of readers, but may eventually be replaced by technology like quick sync. Both microprocessors were tested on asus p8h61m motherboard with 2 gb dualchannel corsair cm3x102433c9 ddr3 memory, and integrated onchip intel sandy bridge graphics. Im sure theres a couple of threads like this, but theyre filled with useless posts that will distract people from the point in hand. Intel core i72600k, i52500k and core i32100 tested.

The i3 2100 is quicker than its predecessor, however not by much. Intel quick sync video is intels brand for its dedicated video encoding and decoding hardware. Intel core i52500k processore 3,3 ghz scatola 6 mb cache intelligente bx80623i52500k processori core i52500k 6m cache, 3. The data on this chart is gathered from usersubmitted geekbench 5 results from the geekbench browser.

1390 1096 512 131 1059 905 589 713 1473 1448 460 543 139 1246 1180 372 302 38 260 587 1143 991 619 866 987 1365 318 597 1399 1170 223 478 666 1250 1028 976 190 622